ArticleJACC. Basic to translational science2025
Novel Method for Predicting Lp(a) From Genomic Testing Identifies ASCVD Risk Across a Diverse Cohort.
Article in JACC. Basic to translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in understanding the spectrum of genetic determinants of lipoprotein(a) levels.Current opinion in lipidology · 2026Review
- Genetic Prediction of Circulating Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Diverse Populations.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Combining Genetic Tools to Determine Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations and Their Associated Cardiovascular Risks Across Different Ethnicities.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is a genetic and often unmeasured contributor to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. In this study, Lp(a) was estimated from exome data by quantifying Kringle IV subtype 2 repeats alongside a single-nucleotide variant-based genetic risk score. This method was applied to a diverse cohort (N = 76,147) from the Helix Research Network. The method better identified individuals with high Lp(a) levels, especially among individuals not genetically similar to Europeans. High genetic risk for high Lp(a) level was correlated with earlier and more frequent ASCVD diagnoses. Those with high genetic Lp(a) were more likely to have ASCVD without traditional risk factors present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.