Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40742213›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

A Novel In Vitro Scrubber Model for Evaluating Wound Cleansing on Biofilms.

Fergus Watson, Marcus J Swann, Jeanne Saint Bezard, Rui Chen, Alisha Oropallo, Steven L Percival

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Novel In Vitro Scrubber Model for Evaluating Wound Cleansing on Biofilms.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fergus Watson5D Health Protection Group Limited, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7080-4878
Marcus J Swann5D Health Protection Group Limited, Liverpool, UK.
Jeanne Saint Bezard5D Health Protection Group Limited, Liverpool, UK.
Rui Chen5D Health Protection Group Limited, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8384-4353
Alisha OropalloComprehensive Wound Healing Center and Hyperbarics, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA.
Steven L Percival5D Health Protection Group Limited, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Urgo Medical North America
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wounds are a significant burden on patients and hospitals globally, with all exhibiting high microbial loading and biofilm. Wound cleansing is critical for removing foreign contaminants, damaged tissue and opportunistic pathogens, allowing for improved healing. This study addresses the need for a standardised in vitro preclinical model for comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial wound cleansing solutions with mechanical disruption on biofilms. A novel model was developed to emulate cleaning practises whilst standardising pressure applied and scrubbing forces applied to the wound bed. Using wounded porcine explants, microbial biofilms were formed on the surface before exposure to varying physical parameters and cleaning solutions. The results showed that both increased pressure and scrubbing duration had a positive impact on biofilm removal, demonstrating > 1 log reduction in microbial levels. The model was able to show the significant difference in cleaning solutions between saline and an antimicrobial-based solution (HClO), > 4.5 log reduction, whilst under identical conditions. Confocal laser microscopy, using fluorescent viability stains, provided supporting evidence of biofilm disruption using gauze. The model's adaptability and versatility help to provide clinically relevant in vitro evidence and effective comparisons of wound cleansing agents on biofilms through the standardisation of different cleaning techniques.

Indexed as

BiofilmsWound HealingWound InfectionWounds and InjuriesAnimalsIn Vitro TechniquesMicroscopy, ConfocalSwineantimicrobialbiofilmcleansinghygienewound

Identifiers

PMID40742213
PMCPMC12312670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.