ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
A Novel In Vitro Scrubber Model for Evaluating Wound Cleansing on Biofilms.
Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of a novel thermo-reversible wound gel against antibiotic tolerant biofilm.Frontiers in antibiotics · 2026Article
- A Novel In Vitro Scrubber Model for Evaluating Wound Cleansing on Biofilms.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic wounds are a significant burden on patients and hospitals globally, with all exhibiting high microbial loading and biofilm. Wound cleansing is critical for removing foreign contaminants, damaged tissue and opportunistic pathogens, allowing for improved healing. This study addresses the need for a standardised in vitro preclinical model for comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial wound cleansing solutions with mechanical disruption on biofilms. A novel model was developed to emulate cleaning practises whilst standardising pressure applied and scrubbing forces applied to the wound bed. Using wounded porcine explants, microbial biofilms were formed on the surface before exposure to varying physical parameters and cleaning solutions. The results showed that both increased pressure and scrubbing duration had a positive impact on biofilm removal, demonstrating > 1 log reduction in microbial levels. The model was able to show the significant difference in cleaning solutions between saline and an antimicrobial-based solution (HClO), > 4.5 log reduction, whilst under identical conditions. Confocal laser microscopy, using fluorescent viability stains, provided supporting evidence of biofilm disruption using gauze. The model's adaptability and versatility help to provide clinically relevant in vitro evidence and effective comparisons of wound cleansing agents on biofilms through the standardisation of different cleaning techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.