ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Dynamics and Interplay of the Binding Pockets in the Glycine Receptor.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The glycine receptor, a pentameric ligand-gated ion channel, plays a vital role in inhibitory neurotransmission, reflexes, and neuronal excitability. It is crucial to maintaining the balance and responsiveness of the nervous system to sensory input. The binding of ligands, in this case, glycines, in the extracellular domain (ECD) of the receptor initiates a series of conformational rearrangements that culminate in the opening of the ion channel in the transmembrane domain. There are five binding sites for orthosteric ligands at the interface among the five subunits of the receptor. Experiments suggest that two or three bound glycines are sufficient to activate the receptor and that the occupancy of binding sites affects (un)binding rates. Here, we evaluated the dynamics and interplay of empty and occupied binding pockets and their potential cooperativity. We investigated ECD models for the glycine receptor, built from cryo-EM data, by performing molecular dynamics simulations for different combinations of ligand occupancies. We highlighted the role of glycine in contracting the binding site, optimizing the water content to the amount necessary to mediate crucial interactions and dragging Loop C to cover the pocket. Each subunit participates in two adjacent binding pockets acting, in turn, as the principal and complementary subunit, with structures such as Loop B and Loop F being directly connected. This suggests a combination of push-pull mechanisms mediated by ligands in a potentially frustrated system, which may favor specific occupancy patterns or alternation of binding sites with different levels of contraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.