Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40742183›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient safety2025

Engineering Safe Care Journeys: Designing a Patient Safety Passport.

Nicole E Werner, Maureen Smith, Rachel A Rutkowski, Hanna J Barton, Kathryn Wust, Peter Hoonakker, Barbara J King, Manish N Shah, Brian W Patterson, Michael S Pulia and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nicole E WernerVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0003-2363-9491
Maureen SmithDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health.
Rachel A RutkowskiDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering.
Hanna J BartonBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health.
Kathryn WustDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Peter HoonakkerWisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Barbara J KingSchool of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Manish N ShahBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health.
Brian W PattersonBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health.
Michael S PuliaDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering.
Paula Vw DailUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Patient and Family Advisory Council, Madison, Wisconsin.
Pascale CarayonDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering.

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002374 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Bo Liu, Marin Leigh Schweizer · 2017 to 2026
$9.7M
Mentoring and Research in Patient-Oriented Geriatric Emergency CareK24AG054560 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SHAH, MANISH N · 2017 to 2021
$955k
AHRQ HHS R18 HS026624NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002374NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NIA NIH HHS K24 AG054560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to use a participatory Human Factors Engineering (HFE) approach to identify key design guidelines and design requirements of a patient safety passport (PSP) to improve patient safety at care transition points along the patient journey.

methodsWe conducted a work system analysis and participatory design process to integrate the needs of multiple perspectives using cognitive interviews, contextual inquiry, team-based analysis, and codesign sessions.

resultsWe conducted semistructured interviews (N=29) with clinicians. We also conducted 20 contextual inquiry observations of older adult patients in the emergency department (ED) followed by 20 interviews with the ED clinicians who cared for those patients. We mapped the care transition process that included transitioning to the ED, being seen in the ED, and transitioning from the ED to the next location. We identified 21 categories representing the interaction of work system barriers and facilitators to safe ED care transitions. We identified 5 design guidelines, which provide the overarching conceptual characteristics of a PSP, and 5 design requirements to guide PSP design.

conclusionsOur participatory HFE approach with a multidisciplinary design team identified key design guidelines and requirements for a PSP. Although this work was focused on the ED, a PSP is likely applicable to a range of care transition domains. Future work should seek to validate and refine PSP design requirements and guidelines across domains as part of a learning health system that can transform care transitions to be points of patient safety resilience.

Indexed as

care transitionemergency departmenthuman factors engineeringolder adultparticipatory designpatient-centeredpatient journeypatient safety passportSEIPS

Identifiers

PMID40742183
PMCPMC13032783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.