Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40742138›Full record

ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2025

Willingness to Comply With Health Advice on COVID-19 in Rural Australia: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey.

Jodie Kleinschafer, Julaine Allan, Teesta Saksena, Azizur Rahman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jodie KleinschaferSchool of Business, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2277-4130
Julaine AllanRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9299-5866
Teesta SaksenaWestern NSW Local Health District, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Azizur RahmanSchool of Computing, Mathematics and Engineering, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7670-5192

Funding

Charles Sturt University Covid-19 Research Support Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRural populations were particularly vulnerable to COVID-19. However, willingness to comply with health advice varied across population groups and was influenced by perceptions of risk.

objectiveThis study aimed to identify the characteristics of the population (e.g., age, gender, First Nations status, perceived vulnerability, efficacy and levels of fear) associated with variations in compliance with health advice in rural Australia to inform health communication strategies for future pandemics. METHODS-DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsThe study used a cross-sectional online survey of Australian residents aged 18 years and over (n = 701) residing in western NSW, Australia. Both bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted, including multinomial logistic regression modelling.

resultsThe characteristics that predicted both intention to comply with health advice and actual behaviour were gender (being female), First Nations status (Aboriginal) and age (older). The lower the perceived risk to the individual, the more likely they were to have limited or no intention to comply with preventative measures. A bivariate correlation analysis determined that there was a small (r = 0.265) significant (p < 0.001) correlation between intention to comply with preventative measures and the frequency with which people engaged in good hygiene practices.

conclusionsThe results provide a means to identify groups in rural areas that need tailored health communications to encourage compliance with health advice. The members of the community who were less vulnerable to illness, particularly young men, were less likely to comply. In future pandemics, governments could take both a geographic and population group segmented approach to health communications instead of a blanket approach.

Indexed as

COVID-19Rural PopulationAdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCOVID‐19health advice compliancehealth behavioursrural health communications

Identifiers

PMID40742138
PMCPMC12312623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.