Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40742119›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

Salient Memory: Effects of Distributed Learning on Cortical Regions During Memory Retrieval.

Cuihong Li, Jiongjiong Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cuihong LiSchool of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0839-9645
Jiongjiong YangSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32071027National Natural Science Foundation of China 32200856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spaced or distributed learning is an efficient way to enhance memory, especially after long retention intervals, and the lag between repetition influences memory retention. Studies have suggested that various cortical regions are involved in the spacing effect, but how the cortical regions are involved to support memory retrieval, especially at longer intervals, after DL with varying inter-study lags is still unclear. To address this issue, three groups of participants were asked to encode face-scene pairs at 20 min, 1 day, and 1 month before they were scanned by fMRI during an associative recognition task. The pairs were learned six times in three conditions: a massed (ML), distributed with a short lag (DL-S) and distributed with a long lag (DL-L). The results showed that the activation in the salience network, including the insula and cingulate cortex, was stronger when the participants retrieved the pairs correctly in the DL-L and DL-S conditions than in the ML condition. In addition, the inferior frontal gyrus/insula was more strongly activated when the new associations were correctly rejected in the DL-L than in the DL-S condition at 1 month. The functional connectivity between the hippocampus and prefrontal cortices was stronger in the DL-L than in the DL-S condition at 1 month. These results suggest that successful memory retrieval after distributed learning is associated with the regions that are responsible for salience detection and top-down control, especially at long-term retention. More salient and controlled representations could be established over time after DL and are supported by distributed brain networks.

Indexed as

Association LearningCerebral CortexLearningMental RecallRecognition, PsychologyAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adultcognitive controldistributed learningepisodic memorysalience network

Identifiers

PMID40742119
PMCPMC12312209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.