ArticleThe British journal of educational psychology2026
Trauma-informed practice for children and young people with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review.
Article in The British journal of educational psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for physical restraint use with children and youth in community and inpatient mental health settings in Ontario.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026Article
- Trauma-informed practice for children and young people with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review.The British journal of educational psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is growing consensus that children and young people (CYP) with an intellectual disability are more likely to experience trauma than those in the general population, which can exacerbate their vulnerabilities and developmental challenges. Trauma-informed practices (TIPs) have been used to support those who have experienced trauma, but we need to know more about the implementation of TIPs with this population.
aimThe study aimed to synthesize research investigating TIPs for CYP with intellectual disabilities. The review examined what TIPs, policies and models have been implemented, the effectiveness of these and barriers and facilitators of trauma-informed intervention implementation.
methodsA scoping review was conducted of quantitative and qualitative research. In total, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Study findings were analysed using a narrative synthesis approach.
findingsThe review identified several TIPs that have been used to support CYP with intellectual disability. However, limited intervention studies were found. Teacher training was discussed as a barrier and facilitator of TIP. Training is needed to enhance staff's ability, skills, and knowledge. It was also reported that adaptations to usual TIP can enhance efficacy.
conclusionsThe findings have implications for research, practice, and policy. More intervention studies are needed with this population. Policymakers must recognize the importance of teacher training and take action to provide such opportunities. We also urge practitioners to make adaptations to usual trauma therapy when working with CYP with intellectual disability. In doing so, such individuals may overcome trauma-related barriers and achieve positive developmental outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.