ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025
Factors predicting myopia incidence in China and Europe.
Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Axial Length to Corneal Curvature Ratio is Insufficient for Detecting Pseudomyopia in Children: A Multi-Cohort Study.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Article
- Factors predicting myopia incidence in China and Europe.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Article
- IMI-2025 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Awareness of Myopia Associated Complications and Perspectives on Myopia Management Among Parents of Children with Myopia in France and the UK.Patient related outcome measures · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo develop a predictive model for myopia incidence using population-based data from Chinese and European children.
methodsAnalysis of four longitudinal studies from the UK, Sweden and China was conducted. Data from 4405 non-myopic children aged 6 to 16.8 years with spherical equivalent (SE) refraction from -0.49 D to +10.00 D were analysed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the probability of myopia incidence by 12 and 24 months based on age, sex, parental myopia, cycloplegic SE, axial length and axial length/corneal radius of curvature (AL/CR). Hyperopic reserve was defined as the minimum level of hyperopia required to provide <10% probability of developing myopia by 24 months.
resultsThe cumulative incidence of myopia by the 24th month was 18.8% for Chinese and 6.7% for European (p < 0.001) populations. Based on multivariate Cox regression, a greater risk of myopia incidence was seen in Chinese children, younger ages, females, children with parental myopia, less hyperopic SE and higher AL/CR. SE had the highest predictive accuracy (C statistic 0.90). The AL/CR ratio had a greater predictive accuracy (C statistic 0.75) than axial length alone (C statistic 0.63). Predictive accuracy of all variables was similar between ethnicities (p > 0.50) apart from axial length, which was higher in Chinese children (C statistic 0.65) versus European children (C statistic 0.55, p = 0.04). To avert the risk of myopia, Chinese eyes required a greater hyperopic reserve ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 D compared to European eyes ranging from 0 to 0.5 D, depending on age and other predictive factors.
conclusionsSE is the strongest predictive factor for both ethnicities. The influence of predictive factors is similar between ethnicities/regions though Chinese children have a greater risk of developing myopia and require a higher hyperopic reserve. These data could be useful for developing a predictive tool of myopia incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.