Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741943›Full record

ArticleCancer research communications2025

GPSai: A Clinically Validated AI Tool for Tissue of Origin Prediction during Routine Tumor Profiling.

Hassan Ghani, Anthony Helmstetter, Jennifer R Ribeiro, Todd Maney, Stephanie Rock, Rebecca A Feldman, Jeff Swensen, Farah Abdulla, David B Spetzler, Elena Florento and 10 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Hassan GhaniCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0009-0004-0993-8094
Anthony HelmstetterCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0009-0002-0392-6522
Jennifer R RibeiroCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-1685-8568
Todd ManeyCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0009-0005-5207-3775
Stephanie RockCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-5700-6954
Rebecca A FeldmanCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-4502-1473
Jeff SwensenCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-8204-4220
Farah AbdullaCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-3455-7566
David B SpetzlerCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-9531-0970
Elena FlorentoCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0009-0005-3564-3190
Ari M VanderwaldeCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-6842-2563
Patricia PittmanCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0009-0004-5790-0779
Milan RadovichCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-9667-156X
Jaclyn HechtmanCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-2645-0985
Casey BalesCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-1016-6042
George W SledgeCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-0297-0775
Myra M GeorgeCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0009-0002-4017-8500
David BryantCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0009-0006-4751-5927
Jim P AbrahamCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-5038-1735
Matthew J OberleyCaris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-6419-2513

Funding

Caris Life Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A subset of cancers present with unclear or potentially incorrect primary histopathologic diagnoses, including cancers of unknown primary (CUP). We aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) tool, Genomic Probability Score AI (GPSai™), which predicts tumor tissue of origin in CUP and flags potential misdiagnoses for additional workup during routine molecular testing. The GPSai model was trained on whole exome and whole transcriptome data from 201,612 cases submitted for tumor profiling at Caris Life Sciences. Retrospective (N = 21,549) and prospective (N = 76,271) validations were performed. The clinical impact was evaluated over 8 months of live testing and through physician surveys. GPSai demonstrated 95.0% accuracy in non-CUP cases and reported on tumor tissue of origin in 84.0% of CUP and 96.3% of non-CUP cases. During the initial 8 months of implementation, GPSai changed the diagnosis on 704 patients (0.88% of all profiled cases), which were supported by orthogonal evidence including imaging, IHC, mutational signatures, hallmark fusions, or viral reads. Diagnosis changes prompted changes in targeted therapy eligibility based on level 1 clinical evidence in 86.1% of cases (n = 606/704). A majority (89.7%; n = 87/97) of physician responses indicated acceptance of the GPSai results, and 53.6% (n = 52/97) of responses stated that the results prompted a change in treatment plan. GPSai accurately identifies tumor tissue of origin and has the potential for clinical impact in a small but meaningful subset of patients with CUP or pathologically ambiguous tumors. Our results support the integration of this AI tool into routine molecular testing to improve diagnostic accuracy and guide subsequent therapeutic decisions. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings show that GPSai, a deep learning-based tool, can support the identification of primary tumor sites with high accuracy in conjunction with orthogonal evidence. Its integration into routine tumor profiling furthermore allows simultaneous biomarker identification. Analysis of real-world implementation of GPSai shows that it enhances diagnostic accuracy, including resolution of CUP cases, and prompts clinically relevant therapeutic recommendation changes without requiring additional specimen.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeoplasms, Unknown PrimaryAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTranscriptomeBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID40741943
PMCPMC12399951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.