ReviewProteomics. Clinical applications2025
Artificial Intelligence and the Evolving Landscape of Immunopeptidomics.
Review in Proteomics. Clinical applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Peptide Arrays as Tools for Unraveling Tumor Microenvironments and Drug Discovery in Oncology.Cells · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in peptide cancer vaccine design: from neoantigen discovery to immunogenicity prediction.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Recent advances in multimodal foundation model-enabled peptide screening and optimization for smart biomaterials and functional tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and the Evolving Landscape of Immunopeptidomics.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmunopeptidomics is the large-scale study of peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and plays a central role in neoantigen discovery and cancer immunotherapy. However, the complexity of mass spectrometry data, the diversity of peptide sources, and variability in immune responses present major challenges in this field. REVIEW FOCUS: In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods have become central to advancing key steps in immunopeptidomics. It has enabled advances in de novo sequencing, peptide-spectrum matching, spectrum prediction, MHC binding prediction, and T cell recognition modeling. In this review, we examine these applications in detail, highlighting how AI is integrated into each stage of the immunopeptidomics workflow. CASE STUDY: This review presents a focused case study on breast cancer, a heterogeneous and historically less immunogenic tumor type, to examine how AI may help overcome limitations in identifying actionable neoantigens. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES: We discuss current bottlenecks, including challenges in modeling noncanonical peptides, accounting for antigen processing defects, and avoiding on-target off-tumor toxicity. Finally, we outline future directions for improving AI models to support both personalized and off-the-shelf immunotherapy strategies. SUMMARY: Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping the immunopeptidomics landscape by overcoming challenges in peptide identification, immunogenicity prediction, and neoantigen prioritization. This review highlights how AI-based tools enhance the detection of MHC-bound peptides-including low-abundance, noncanonical, and post-translationally modified epitopes and improve peptide-spectrum matching and T-cell epitope prediction. By demonstrating a case study on applications in breast cancer, we illustrate the potential of AI to reveal hidden immunogenic features in tumors previously likely considered immunologically "cold." These advancements open new opportunities for expanding neoantigen discovery pipelines and optimizing cancer immunotherapies. Looking ahead, the application of deep learning, transfer learning, and integrated multi-omics models may further elevate the accuracy and scalability of immunopeptidomics, enabling more effective and inclusive vaccine and T-cell therapy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.