ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2025
Tooth Graft and Platelet-Rich Fibrin Mixture for Oral Bone Reconstruction and Preservation: A Scoping Review.
Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment of a dentigerous cyst with autologous tooth grafting and platelet-rich plasma: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Eighty-Four-Month Clinical Outcomes of Autologous Dentin Graft Using Tooth TransformerJournal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis scoping review aimed to evaluate effectiveness of using tooth graft (TG) mixture with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), examining their roles in oral bone reconstruction and preservation, and evaluating the clinical and histopathological outcomes associated with this approach. MATERIAL AND
methodsArticles were searched in Scopus, Medline, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Google Scholar up to November 2024. The search was guided by the PCC framework: Population: alveolar bone and calvaria bone defects; Concept: the use of a TG mixture with PRF as a bone graft material; Context: clinical and histopathological outcomes of oral bone reconstruction and preservation. Two independent researchers carried out the screening, study selection, and data extraction processes.
resultsUse of the PRF and TG mixture for socket preservation is superior to using each of these biomaterials individually. However, in the context of bone reconstruction, although all studies confirm new bone formation, the superiority of this mixture over the separate use of each biomaterial remains uncertain. Additionally, all studies confirm the increase in bone density and new bone formation aimed at implant placement.
conclusionThe majority of studies have reported that the PRF and TG mixture enhances both the quality and quantity of bone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.