Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741717›Full record

ReviewAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2025

Responsive Polyelectrolyte Brushes in Applications: Functions, Stimuli, and Design Considerations.

Leon A Smook, Andreas Dahlin, Karin Schroën, Sissi de Beer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Vesicle adhesion in flow.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leon A SmookDepartment of Molecules and Materials, MESA+ Institute, University of Twente, Enschede, 7500 AE, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4176-8801
Andreas DahlinDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, 41296, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1545-5860
Karin SchroënLaboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, 6708 WG, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1713-3278
Sissi de BeerDepartment of Molecules and Materials, MESA+ Institute, University of Twente, Enschede, 7500 AE, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7208-6814

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek P19-20 ReCoVR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyelectrolyte brushes are stimulus-responsive coatings that change surface properties such as friction, adhesion, and interaction with biomolecules. Brush coatings are becoming increasingly available with improving synthesis and fabrication methods, but their use in real-world applications is trailing behind. With their stimulus-controlled properties, brushes can fulfill a variety of functions when they are applied in a broad spectrum of use cases ranging from tunable lubrication to ionic current rectification. In this review, summarizes the functional roles polyelectrolyte brushes can play in applications by affecting the mechanical, molecular, and electrical properties of surfaces; the main stimuli that are used to exploit the responsiveness of these coatings are discussed; and design considerations to choose an initial brush when designing systems for new applications are provided. This review concludes with a short outlook on the outstanding challenges and opportunities for applying stimulus-responsive polyelectrolyte brushes.

Indexed as

functional surfacespolyelectrolyte brushesstimulus‐response

Identifiers

PMID40741717
PMCPMC12548512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.