ArticleBrain and behavior2025
Developing an Explainable Prognostic Model for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Combining Clinical and Inflammatory Biomarkers With Machine Learning.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond NIHSS and neuroimaging: an interpretable gradient boosting model for predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with acute ischemic stroke.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Monocyte-to-Albumin Ratio (MAR) Is Associated With All-Cause Mortality in Adult Stroke Patients: Evidence From NHANES (1999-2018).Stroke research and treatment · 2026Article
- A machine learning-based predictive nomogram for early neurological improvement after thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Admission monocyte-to-albumin ratio predicts 3-month functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting the prognosis of patients with acute cerebral infarction (ACI) is crucial for clinical decision-making and personalized treatment. However, existing models often lack the comprehensive integration of clinical and biological indicators necessary for accurate and interpretable predictions. This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model using a combination of clinical assessments and inflammatory biomarkers to improve the prognostication of ACI patients.
methodsThis real-world, retrospective cohort study was conducted at Luhe Hospital, Beijing, and included 1,017 ACI patients admitted within 24 h of symptom onset. The dataset was randomly split into a training set (80%) and a validation set (20%). Twelve machine learning models were developed and evaluated, with the optimal model and feature set selected based on comprehensive performance metrics. To enhance interpretability, the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed to quantify and visualize the contribution of each feature to the model's predictions.
resultsThe final model, utilizing the Logistic Regression (LR) algorithm, incorporated six key features: NIHSS at 24 h (NIHSS_24 h), NIHSS_change, D-dimer, neutrophil count (N), lymphocyte percentage at 24 h (L_pct_24 h), and length of stay (LOS). NIHSS_24 h emerged as a critical early prognostic indicator, effectively predicting three-month outcomes post-discharge. Inflammatory markers, including D-dimer, N, and L_pct_24 h, significantly enhanced the model's predictive performance. The SHAP method provided both global and local interpretability, elucidating the relative importance of each feature in the model's predictions. To facilitate clinical decision-making, a web-based application was developed for real-time prognostic assessment.
conclusionThis study developed a robust and interpretable predictive model for ACI prognosis by integrating clinical and inflammatory biomarkers. The model underscores the prognostic significance of NIHSS_24 h and inflammatory markers, highlighting the critical role of early assessment and personalized treatment strategies. Future research should focus on multi-center validation and the incorporation of additional predictive variables to further enhance the model's accuracy and generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.