Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741677›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2025

Developing an Explainable Prognostic Model for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Combining Clinical and Inflammatory Biomarkers With Machine Learning.

Linlin Ma, Lang Ji, Zhe Cheng, Xiaokun Geng, Yuchuan Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linlin MaDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3517-1593
Lang JiCentral Laboratory, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhe ChengDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaokun GengDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuchuan DingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8394-9147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting the prognosis of patients with acute cerebral infarction (ACI) is crucial for clinical decision-making and personalized treatment. However, existing models often lack the comprehensive integration of clinical and biological indicators necessary for accurate and interpretable predictions. This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model using a combination of clinical assessments and inflammatory biomarkers to improve the prognostication of ACI patients.

methodsThis real-world, retrospective cohort study was conducted at Luhe Hospital, Beijing, and included 1,017 ACI patients admitted within 24 h of symptom onset. The dataset was randomly split into a training set (80%) and a validation set (20%). Twelve machine learning models were developed and evaluated, with the optimal model and feature set selected based on comprehensive performance metrics. To enhance interpretability, the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed to quantify and visualize the contribution of each feature to the model's predictions.

resultsThe final model, utilizing the Logistic Regression (LR) algorithm, incorporated six key features: NIHSS at 24 h (NIHSS_24 h), NIHSS_change, D-dimer, neutrophil count (N), lymphocyte percentage at 24 h (L_pct_24 h), and length of stay (LOS). NIHSS_24 h emerged as a critical early prognostic indicator, effectively predicting three-month outcomes post-discharge. Inflammatory markers, including D-dimer, N, and L_pct_24 h, significantly enhanced the model's predictive performance. The SHAP method provided both global and local interpretability, elucidating the relative importance of each feature in the model's predictions. To facilitate clinical decision-making, a web-based application was developed for real-time prognostic assessment.

conclusionThis study developed a robust and interpretable predictive model for ACI prognosis by integrating clinical and inflammatory biomarkers. The model underscores the prognostic significance of NIHSS_24 h and inflammatory markers, highlighting the critical role of early assessment and personalized treatment strategies. Future research should focus on multi-center validation and the incorporation of additional predictive variables to further enhance the model's accuracy and generalizability.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansInflammationMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment Dbiological indicatorsmachine learningprognosisSHAP

Identifiers

PMID40741677
PMCPMC12311615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.