ReviewTzu chi medical journal
A comprehensive review of surgical techniques for chronic Achilles tendon rupture.
Review in Tzu chi medical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Minimally invasive surgery for insertional Achilles tendinopathy : Do Haglund resection, refixation of the Achilles tendon and Zadek osteotomy also work using minimally invasive techniques?]Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic Achilles tendon rupture (CATR) represents a significant clinical challenge, often necessitating surgical intervention to restore function, alleviate pain, and prevent long-term complications. The complex nature of CATR, characterized by tendon retraction, scar formation, and poor tissue quality, requires a tailored, evidence-based approach. This review comprehensively examines current surgical strategies for managing CATR, focusing on their indications, advantages, outcomes, and associated complications. A detailed literature search of 20 studies published between 2010 and 2023 identified key surgical techniques, including end-to-end repair, tendon transfers, autografts, synthetic grafts, and allografts. Surgical recommendations were stratified by defect size and patient factors. Small defects (<2 cm) are effectively managed with end-to-end repair or tendon transfers, offering rapid recovery and restoration of tendon continuity. Medium defects (2-5 cm) benefit from techniques such as V-Y plasty or semitendinosus autografts, providing additional length and biomechanical stability. Larger defects (>5 cm) often necessitate advanced procedures, including free tendon grafts, synthetic materials, or allografts, particularly for older patients or those with poor tissue quality. Minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic flexor hallucis longus transfer, have shown promise in reducing recovery times and complications. A structured decision-making framework is proposed to guide surgical choices, ensuring patient-specific, optimal outcomes. Emerging techniques further expand the possibilities for managing this challenging condition, emphasizing the need for innovation and individualized care in CATR treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.