ArticleTzu chi medical journal
Long-term cardiovascular outcomes after exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation among coronavirus disease 2019 survivors: A nationwide cohort study.
Article in Tzu chi medical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with poor cardiac outcomes and an increased risk of long-term cardiovascular disease. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes among patients with COVID-19 after exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation remain largely unknown. This study aimed to investigate the long-term cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19 survivors after exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation using real-world data. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the data from the US Collaborative Network of the TriNetX Research Database. Adults aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between 2020 and 2022 were enrolled in this study. The comparison comprised a cohort of patients receiving exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation and 1:1 propensity score-matched controls. Results: The exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation group was found to have lower risks of developing several long-term cardiovascular outcomes than the controls, such as mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75 [0.63-0.89]), stroke (HR = 0.81 [0.68-0.94]), myocardial infarction (HR = 0.75 [0.61-0.89]), ischemic cardiomyopathy (HR = 0.86 [0.75-0.99]), heart failure (HR = 0.73 [0.65-0.83]), and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (HR = 0.78 [0.63-0.92]). Conclusion: Among COVID-19 survivors, those undergoing cardiac rehabilitation had lower risks of cardiovascular outcomes, including mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, ischemic cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, than those of controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.