ArticleTzu chi medical journal
Allogeneic human umbilical cord blood for acute ischemic stroke: Phase I clinical trial.
Article in Tzu chi medical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stem cell-mediated recovery in stroke: partnering with the immune system.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Transplantation of human umbilical cord blood cells (hUCB) may enhance neuroprotection, and thus, the intravenous (IV) infusion of hUCB in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is being tested for its safety and efficacy. Materials and Methods: We conducted a 12-month, open-label, and single-center, phase I trial of hUCB treatment in AIS patients at the age of 45-80 years, with magnetic resonance imaging evidence of acute infarction in the internal carotid artery supplied territory and the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score between 6 and 18. Eligible participants received a single-dose IV infusion of hUCB followed by the two doses of mannitol infusion within 9 days after the onset of stroke symptoms. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and the secondary endpoints were the changes in NIHSS, Barthel index (BI), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) scores. Results: Six patients (Male: Female = 3: 3) were enrolled with a mean age at 65.8 years. A total of 40 AEs occurred in six participants during this study, which included nine serious adverse events. Only transient erythema multiforme and hematuria were probably and possibly related to hUCB infusion, respectively. The mean NIHSS score was 11.5 at baseline and it significantly improved at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment (mean change from baseline: -4.0, -5.3, -6.8, -7.0, and -7.3). The mean BI score was 22.5 at baseline and it significantly increased at 3 and 6 months after treatment (mean change from baseline: 26.7 and 42.5, respectively). The BBS score increased numerically but did not reach statistical significance. The changes in cytokine levels and spleen size were unremarkable. Conclusion: The IV hUCB was safe and well tolerated in AIS patients, and the preliminary efficacy results demonstrated its therapeutic potential, supporting the conduct of a randomized, placebo controlled, phase II clinical trial in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.