ReviewCureus2025
Start With the End: Early Hospital Discharge Planning as a Day-One Priority.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite decades of operational improvement, discharge delays remain a widespread and costly challenge across hospitals. These delays contribute to overcrowded units, inefficient use of resources, and avoidable patient harm. Importantly, many of these delays are not due to unresolved medical issues but to late-stage communication breakdowns, unclear expectations, and inadequate preparation for the transition out of the hospital. Too often, discharge is approached reactively, rather than proactively integrated into the patient's care plan from the outset. This narrative review reframes discharge planning through a critical but underutilized lens: early and proactive engagement of patients and families. We examine the growing body of evidence supporting the use of tools such as bedside whiteboards, structured interdisciplinary rounds, Estimated Date of Discharge (EDD) documentation, and day-one family contact. Studies show that when the EDD is established within 24 hours and reinforced throughout the stay, hospitals experience fewer non-medical delays, improved patient and caregiver satisfaction, and reductions in length of stay. Furthermore, this approach improves coordination among care teams by providing a shared, visible timeline around which clinical decisions and discharge planning activities can be organized. However, despite its benefits, widespread implementation is hindered by cultural inertia, inconsistent documentation, competing clinical priorities, and a lack of standardized protocols. Drawing on published quality improvement studies and institutional practices, we propose a Day One Discharge Engagement model as a scalable strategy for transforming the discharge process into a continuous, collaborative, and patient-centered effort. This model not only improves hospital efficiency but reframes discharge as an integral part of healing, one that begins at admission and culminates in a safe, supported transition home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.