ArticleCureus2025
Evaluating the Quality of Online Information on Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) Using the DISCERN Instrument.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPercutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure increasingly referenced in patient-oriented websites. However, the quality of such online health information is inconsistent. This study evaluates the quality of Italian-language web content on PELD using the DISCERN tool.
methodsA systematic search was conducted on 25 May 2025 using the Italian-language interface of Google (Google LLC, Mountain View, California, United States) with the keywords "PELD," "discectomia endoscopica percutanea," and "ernia del disco PELD." Twenty websites targeted at the general public were selected. Each was independently assessed using the 16-item DISCERN instrument by two trained reviewers. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficient.
resultsThe mean overall DISCERN score across the 20 websites was 39.5 (SD = 8.7) out of 80, indicating moderate-to-low quality. High-scoring domains included clarity of procedural explanation (mean = 4.2/5), while critical aspects such as citation of sources (mean = 2.1/5) and discussion of uncertainties (mean = 1.7/5) were underrepresented. Cohen's kappa was 0.82, indicating strong agreement between reviewers.
conclusionOnline Italian-language resources on PELD exhibit moderate quality and frequently omit essential components such as treatment risks and alternative options. Enhancing transparency and evidence citation is essential to improve the quality of patient education materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.