ReviewCureus2025
Evaluation of Functional and Clinical Outcomes Following Surgical Repair of Complete Thumb Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Adults: A Systematic Review Across Diverse Populations.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Imaging of hand and wrist injuries in alpine skiing: common injury mechanisms, imaging findings, and treatment.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the thumb is situated on the inner side of the thumb, near the ulnar aspect of the metacarpophalangeal joint. It plays a crucial role in stabilizing the base of the thumb and contributes to grip strength and overall hand function. UCL injuries account for approximately 86% of all injuries affecting the base of the thumb. Treatment for UCL injuries varies depending on severity. When the UCL of the thumb is completely torn, surgical intervention becomes necessary. Significant gaps in the literature still exist despite the growing number of publications on the surgical treatment of complete thumb UCL tears. Thus, this systematic review synthesized existing research to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes of surgical treatments for complete UCL ruptures of the thumb across athletes and the general population. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines. However, the review protocol was not prospectively registered in a systematic review database such as PROSPERO. Articles published between January 1, 2015 and January 30, 2025 were identified through reputable databases including PubMed, PubMed Central, Europe PubMed Central, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Google Scholar. This review included English-language studies with accessible full texts, conducted on human subjects; 12 studies were reviewed for analysis. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) critical appraisal tool was used to evaluate all selected systematic reviews, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the cohort and longitudinal studies. A total of 335 patients from 12 studies were analyzed, with follow-up ranging from 6 months to 15 years. The studies included retrospective and prospective cohorts, as well as systematic reviews. Surgical techniques varied and included suture anchors, tendon grafts, suture tape augmentation, and novel methods such as ultrasound-welded anchors and U-shaped Kirschner wires. Most studies reported favorable outcomes in joint stability, range of motion, strength, pain relief, and patient satisfaction. Among athletes, return-to-sport rates were high (up to 98.1%), often within 5-8 weeks postoperatively. Conclusions indicate that surgical management remains the gold standard for complete UCL tears of the thumb, particularly in cases involving Stener lesions, joint instability, or failed conservative treatment. Techniques such as suture anchor repair, tendon graft reconstruction, and internal brace augmentation consistently yield favorable functional and clinical outcomes, including restored strength, reduced pain, and high patient satisfaction. Although earlier intervention generally leads to better results, positive outcomes are observed across diverse populations. This review highlights the need for high-quality randomized controlled trials to standardize surgical indications, techniques, and postoperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.