ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Hybrid framework for automated generation of mammography radiology reports.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Verification of the impact of differences between objective and subjective evaluation methods on the interpretation of artificial intelligence systems generating mammogram reports using vision-language model.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Large Language Model Translation of BI-RADS Breast Imaging Reports into Arabic: A Blinded Expert Evaluation of Diagnostic Communication Safety.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a significant health concern for women at various stages of life, impacting both productivity and reproductive health. Recent advancements in deep learning (DL) have enabled substantial progress in the automation of radiological reports, offering potential support to radiologists and streamlining examination processes. This study introduces a framework for automated clinical text generation aimed at assisting radiologists in mammography examinations. Rather than replacing medical expertise, the system provides pre-processed evidence and automatic diagnostic suggestions for radiologist validation. The framework leverages an encoder-decoder architecture for natural language generation (NLG) models, trained and fine-tuned on a corpus of Spanish radiological text. Additionally, we incorporate an image intensity enhancement technique to address the issue of image quality variability and assess its impact on report generation outcomes. A comparative analysis using NLG metrics is conducted to identify the optimal feature extraction method. Furthermore, named entity recognition (NER) techniques are employed to extract key clinical concepts and automate precision evaluations. Our results demonstrate that the proposed framework could be a solid starting point for systematizing and implementing automated clinical report generation based on medical images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.