ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025
Developing a Consensus-Based Core Set of Outcome Measures for Ulnar Nerve Surgery: A Delphi Study With Focus on the Supercharged End-to-Side Anterior Interosseous Nerve to Ulnar Nerve Transfer.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The supercharged end-to-side (SETS) anterior interosseous to ulnar nerve transfer is increasingly used to augment intrinsic muscle recovery in patients with severe ulnar neuropathy. However, there is a lack of standardized outcome measures to evaluate the effectiveness of this procedure. This study aimed to develop a consensus-based core set of outcome measures applicable to ulnar nerve surgery, with a specific focus on the SETS transfer. Methods: A two-round modified Delphi process was conducted involving 15 multidisciplinary experts in hand surgery and upper limb rehabilitation. The initial survey was informed by a comprehensive literature review and expert opinion. Participants ranked outcome domains and corresponding measurement tools based on their relevance in both clinical and research settings. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. A second-round survey was conducted to refine the results and focus specifically on outcomes applicable to SETS procedures. Results: In Round 1, experts reached consensus on several key domains including motor function, functional ability, quality of life, pain, dexterity, and sensory evaluation. In Round 2, a refined core outcome set for SETS procedures was established. Lateral pinch strength and daily living function self-assessment were prioritized across both settings. Validated tools endorsed included the Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation, Short Form-12, visual analog scale, nine-hole peg test, and two-point discrimination. Conclusions: This Delphi study established a consensus-based core outcome set for evaluating surgical outcomes following ulnar nerve reconstruction, with specific application to SETS procedures. The proposed framework integrates patient-reported and clinician-rated measures and may support standardization in future research and clinical practice. Clinical relevance: The lack of standardized outcomes for ulnar nerve transfers limits cross-study comparisons and evidence synthesis. This study provides a structured outcome set to support consistent evaluation and improve decision making in patients undergoing SETS or related procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.