Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741504›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2025

Electrospun probiotic (

Subindhira Rajagopal, Valiathan Sreejit, Radhakrishnan Preetha

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Subindhira RajagopalDepartment of Food Process Engineering, School of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu District, Chennai, 603203 Tamil Nadu India.
Valiathan SreejitDepartment of Food Process Engineering, School of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu District, Chennai, 603203 Tamil Nadu India.
Radhakrishnan PreethaDepartment of Food Process Engineering, School of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu District, Chennai, 603203 Tamil Nadu India.ORCID 0000-0002-5032-501X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to develop an electrospun probiotic with a prebiotic for better stability and survival in food systems and during gastrointestinal transit. The probiotic was combined with prebiotic barley extracts and electrospun using chitosan and alginate as polymers. The SEM, TEM, and AFM tests on the electrospun probiotic nanofibers revealed that adding barley improved the fiber morphology and texture. Moreover, electrospinning did not adversely affect the probiotic viability. The encapsulation efficiency of the electrospun nanofibers was 93 ± 0.01% and the probiotic count was 10 log

Indexed as

ElectrospinningFermentationPolymerPrebioticProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID40741504
PMCPMC12304330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.