Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741486›Full record

ArticleVisual cognition2024

Within-Subject Manipulations Of Proactive Control Do Not Change Negative Templates Benefits: Exploring the Effect Of Reward On Negative And Positive Cues.

Matthieu Chidharom, Matt Tong, Nancy B Carlisle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visual cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthieu ChidharomDepartment of Psychology, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015, USA.
Matt TongDepartment of Psychology, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015, USA.
Nancy B CarlisleDepartment of Psychology, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015, USA.

Funding

Examining Flexibility in Visual Attentional ControlR15EY030247 · NEI · LEHIGH UNIVERSITY · PI CARLISLE, NANCY · 2020 to 2020
$336k
NEI NIH HHS R15 EY030247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative templates come from foreknowledge of distractor-features and lead to improved performance during visual search. Recent studies have better characterized the mechanisms underlying these benefits, by showing a critical role of proactive control mechanisms in negative template use. The goal of this study was to test if state-based fluctuations of proactive control play a role in the use of negative templates. To do so, we engaged participants on a visual search task. We used motivation (e.g. rewards) to induce within-individual fluctuations of proactive control efficiency. We replicated previous findings for the positive templates, with faster RT to find the target during periods of high- compared to low-reward conditions. Interestingly, for negative templates, we failed to find evidence for an effect of motivation on the use of negative templates, even when a motivation condition led to faster RTs. Taken together, these results bring new evidence that using negative templates is not modulated by within-individual fluctuations of proactive engagement and are likely more related to trait-based aspects of an individual's ability to engage proactive control efficiently.

Indexed as

Distractor suppressionMotivationNegative templatesProactive controlTrait factors

Identifiers

PMID40741486
PMCPMC12309615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.