Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741411›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025

Bioinformatics-based analysis of the relationship between STC1 expression and immune infiltration in gastric cancer.

Weijun Ma, Xiaoli Ma, Yaoqi Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weijun Ma *Department of Ultrasound, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Xiaoli Ma *The Department of Rehabilitation, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital (Gansu Provincial Center Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Yaoqi LiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The study assessed the expression of STC1, and its potential as an immunotherapy target in gastric cancer (GC). Methods: RNAseq data from the TCGA_STAD project and TCGA-GTEx project of UCSC XENA website and microarray data from GEO (GSE66229) were downloaded. Differential STC1 mRNA expression between GC and non-carcinoma tissues was examined. Its relation to clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Tumor infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME) were assessed by ssGSEA, and T-cell exhaustion by TIMER. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis was performed to validate the correlation between STC1 expression and T-cell exhaustion markers. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was also conducted to explore potential functions of STC1 in GC. Results: STC1 expression was significantly higher in GC tissues and independently predicted poor overall survival. STC1 expression was related to patient T-stage, location, and overall survival events. Immune infiltration analysis showed significant associations between STC1 and multiple immune cells in TME, with strong links to T-cell exhaustion. scRNA-seq analysis confirmed the co-expression of STC1 with T-cell exhaustion markers in specific cell clusters. GSEA identified several signaling pathways, such as "SIGNALING_BY_INTERLEUKINS" and "JAK_STAT_SIGNALING_PATHWAY," linked to STC1 expression in GC. Conclusion: STC1 is a promising target for immunotherapy in GC, as its expression is correlated with patient prognosis, immune infiltration, and T-cell exhaustion.

Indexed as

gastric cancerprognosisStanniocalcin 1T-cell exhaustionTME

Identifiers

PMID40741411
PMCPMC12307138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.