ArticleBio-protocol2025
Protocol for 3D Bioprinting a Co-culture Skin Model Using a Natural Fibrin-Based Bioink as an Infection Model.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stepwise Generation of Vascularized Multilayered 3D Organotypic Skin Models.Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- Elucidating the Impact of Bacterial Composition and Diversity on Skin Homeostasis Using a Human 3D In Vitro Skin Model.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Using silica nanoparticles to deliver antibiotics for treating Gram-positive bacterial infections in a 3D-bioprinted dermal model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The skin microbiome, a diverse community of microorganisms, plays a crucial role in maintaining skin health and homeostasis. Traditional studies have relied on two-dimensional (2D) models, which fail to recreate the complex three-dimensional (3D) architecture and cellular interactions of in vivo human skin, and animal models, which have species-specific physiology and accompanying ethical concerns. Consequently, both types of models fall short in accurately replicating skin physiology and understanding its complex microbial interactions. Three-dimensional bioprinting, an advanced tissue engineering technology, addresses these limitations by creating custom-designed tissue scaffolds using biomaterial-based bioinks containing living cells. This approach provides a more physiologically relevant 3D structure and microenvironment, allowing the incorporation of microbial communities to better reflect in vivo conditions. Here, we present a protocol for 3D bioprinting an in vitro skin infection model by co-culturing human keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts in a high-viscosity, fibrin-based bioink to mimic the dermis and epidermis. The bioprinted skin tissue was co-infected with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.