Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741374›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2025

Protective multi-stressor interactions in the Anthropocene: Key considerations for investigating cross-tolerance in a conservation context.

Essie M Rodgers, Simone Baldanzi, Michael Collins, W Wesley Dowd, Lauric Feugere, Giovanna Mottola, Fanny Vermandele, Daniel F Gomez Isaza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Essie M RodgersSchool of Environmental and Conservation Sciences, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3514-3653
Simone BaldanziLaboratorio de Ecofisiología y Ecología evolutiva marinas (e°CO2lab) and Centro de Observación y Análisis del Ambiente Costero (COSTA-R), Universidad de Valparaíso, Avenida Gran Bretaña, 1111, cerro Playa ancha, 2340000, Valparaíso, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7153-4734
Michael CollinsMarine Biology and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2112-5294
W Wesley DowdSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, 100 Dairy Road, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8153-1983
Lauric FeugereLaboratory of Marine Ecological and Evolutionary Physiology, Department of Biology, Chemistry and Geography, University of Quebec in Rimouski, 300 Allée des Ursulines, Rimouski, QC G5L 3A1, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4984-9350
Giovanna MottolaDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonkatu 7, P.O. Box 111, Joensuu FIN-80101, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7823-9271
Fanny VermandeleLaboratory of Marine Ecological and Evolutionary Physiology, Department of Biology, Chemistry and Geography, University of Quebec in Rimouski, 300 Allée des Ursulines, Rimouski, QC G5L 3A1, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0239-3835
Daniel F Gomez IsazaHarry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South St, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3112-8683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Anthropocene, species are increasingly faced with multiple stressors that are more severe and less predictable than before. While multiple stressors often interact to affect organisms negatively, sometimes these interactions can be beneficial, enhancing resilience through cross-protection. Cross-protection interactions occur when exposure to one stressor, such as elevated temperature, enhances an organism's tolerance to a different stressor, like hypoxia, through shared protective mechanisms or signaling pathways. Understanding the potential for cross-protection to combat rapid and diverse environmental change is crucial for conservation, as it potentially alters the predicted consequences of such change. Here, we outline 10 key considerations for investigating cross-protection in a conservation context. These considerations include the importance of stressor intensity and timing, recognizing species-specific and sex-specific responses, and embracing temporal variability in environmental stressors. Additionally, predictions will depend upon uncovering the underlying mechanisms of cross-protection by integrating emerging approaches like omics and meta-analyses. By better understanding-and in some cases explicitly leveraging-cross-protective interactions, conservation practitioners may be able to develop more effective management plans to enhance species resilience, potentially mitigating the immediate effects of emerging stressors. These insights are vital for guiding future research directions and informing conservation policies and management practices to preserve biodiversity in the Anthropocene.

Indexed as

Abiotic stressorconservation managementcross-protectioncross-talkenvironmental variabilityinducible stress tolerancemultiple stressorspreconditioningspecies resiliencestressor interactions

Identifiers

PMID40741374
PMCPMC12310247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.