Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741371›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2025

Selecting differential splicing methods: Practical considerations for short-read RNA sequencing.

Ben J Draper, Mark J Dunning, David C James

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Role of alternative splicing in cancer progression.Irish journal of medical science · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ben J DraperDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Mappin St., The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-8034-0172
Mark J DunningBioinformatics Core Bioinformatics Core, The Faculty of Health,, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2HQ, UK.
David C JamesDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Mappin St., The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative splicing is crucial in gene regulation, with significant implications in clinical settings and biotechnology. This review article compiles bioinformatics short-read RNA-seq tools for investigating differential splicing; offering a detailed examination of their statistical methods, case applications, and benefits. A total of 22 tools are categorised by their statistical family (parametric, non-parametric, and probabilistic) and level of analysis (transcript, exon, and event). The central challenges in quantifying alternative splicing include correct splice site identification and accurate isoform deconvolution of transcripts. Benchmarking studies show no consensus on tool performance, revealing considerable variability across different scenarios. Tools with high citation frequency and continued developer maintenance, such as DEXSeq and rMATS, are recommended for prospective researchers. To aid in tool selection, a guide schematic is proposed based on variations in data input and the required level of analysis. Emerging long-read RNA sequencing technologies are discussed as a complement to short-read methods, promising reduced deconvolution needs and further innovation.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingComputational BiologySequence Analysis, RNAHumansSoftwareAlternative SplicingBioinformaticsDifferential ExpressionRNASeqTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID40741371
PMCPMC12308171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.