ArticleHuman mutation2025
Genetic Screening of a Nonsyndromic Amelogenesis Imperfecta Patient Cohort Using a Custom smMIP Reagent for Selective Enrichment of Target Loci.
Article in Human mutation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative multi-omics and bioinformatic analysis ofThe Japanese dental science review · 2026Review
- ACP4 Variants in Hypoplastic Amelogenesis Imperfecta.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- NovelJournal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Targeted sequencing with single-molecule molecular inversion probes highlights a gap in understanding the cause of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.Molecular vision · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Amelogenesis is the process of tooth enamel formation, and genetic variants disrupting it cause the Mendelian inherited disorder amelogenesis imperfecta (AI). AI patients have weak, discoloured or brittle enamel, caused by reduced enamel quantity or mineralisation. AI can occur in isolation or, less commonly, as part of a syndrome. Pathogenic variants in at least 38 genes have been shown to cause AI. Current genetic screening studies typically use exome sequencing, but this is expensive and involves complex data analysis workflows. Target enrichment using smMIPs (single molecule molecular inversion probes) provides a flexible alternative, allowing the creation of a disease-specific reagent for low cost, robust, high-throughput screening. Here, we describe the development of an smMIP reagent targeting 19 genes implicated in isolated AI and assess its use in screening a cohort of 181 UK probands with nonsyndromic AI. While this was intended only as a prescreen to prioritise exome sequencing more efficiently, it nevertheless led to molecular diagnoses for 63 probands (35%). Cost per sample screened was approximately £40. Variants in three genes,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.