ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
A study of motor imagery EEG classification based on feature fusion and attentional mechanisms.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Motor imagery-based brain-computer interface for differential diagnosis in prolonged disorders of consciousness.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Motor imagery EEG-based action recognition is an emerging field arising from the intersection of brain science and information science, which has promising applications in the fields of neurorehabilitation and human-computer collaboration. However, existing methods face challenges including the low signal-to-noise ratio of EEG signals, inter-subject variability, and model overfitting. Methods: We propose HA-FuseNet, an end-to-end motor imagery action classification network. This model integrates feature fusion and attention mechanisms to classify left hand, right hand, foot, and tongue movements. Its innovations include: (1) multi-scale dense connectivity, (2) hybrid attention mechanism, (3) global self-attention module, and (4) lightweight design for reduced computational overhead. Results: On BCI Competition IV Dataset 2A, HA-FuseNet achieved 77.89% average within-subject accuracy (8.42% higher than EEGNet) and 68.53% cross-subject accuracy. Conclusion: The model demonstrates robustness to spatial resolution variations and individual differences, effectively mitigating key challenges in motor imagery EEG classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.