ArticleArchives of physiotherapy
Biomechanical of bilateral heel rise, and its association with balance, functional mobility, and walking speed in older adults.
Article in Archives of physiotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Aging advancing decreases ankle-foot strength and mobility, affecting gait and balance control. The heel-rise (HR) task requires the ankle-foot to control different biomechanical demands. It is still unclear whether these demands during HR are associated with functional performance in older adults. The aim was to describe the association between HR biomechanical parameters and single-leg stability, functional mobility, and walking speed in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: Sixty-nine older adults (73.0, SD 6.8 years) were tested on a force platform performing bilateral rapid HR in the rise and drop phases. The biomechanical parameters measured were peak force and time, impulse, root mean square and displacement of the center of pressure (CoP), as well as displacement and velocity of the center of mass (CoM), and vertical stiffness. Functional performance was assessed through balance using the single-leg stance test (SLS), functional mobility with the Timed Up & Go test (TUG), and walking speed (WS). Associations between functional tests and biomechanical parameters were determined using correlation tests. Results: HR peak strength and time showed a medium to large association with TUG and WS but not SLS. CoP anteroposterior displacement showed a large association in the drop phase with all functional tests but not in the rise phase. CoM velocity and vertical stiffness were associated with all tests in both phases. Conclusion: Older adults HR biomechanical parameters are more closely associated with functional mobility and walking speed tests (TUG and WS) than with static balance tests such as SLS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.