Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741272›Full record

ReviewArchives of medical science : AMS2025

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19: a systematic review.

Marius Andrei Zavalichi, Georgiana Ionescu, Cătălina Marina Arsenescu Georgescu, Adelina Mihaescu, Carmen Diana Cimpoesu, Gabriel Cimpoesu, Simona Daniela Zavalichi, Cristian Stătescu, Atalay Demiray, Mehmet Kanbay and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marius Andrei ZavalichiCardiology Department, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute "Prof. Dr. George I.M. Georgescu", University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T.Popa", Iași, Romania.
Georgiana IonescuCardiology Department, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute "Prof. Dr. George I.M. Georgescu", University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T.Popa", Iași, Romania.
Cătălina Marina Arsenescu GeorgescuCardiology and Internal Medicine Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", Iasi, Romania.
Adelina MihaescuDepartment of Internal Medicine II - Division of Nephrology, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Carmen Diana CimpoesuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", Iasi, Romania.
Gabriel CimpoesuCitadin SA, Iasi, Romania.
Simona Daniela ZavalichiPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Rehabilitation Clinical Hospital, Iasi, Romania.
Cristian StătescuCardiology Department, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute "Prof. Dr. George I.M. Georgescu", University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T.Popa", Iași, Romania.
Atalay DemirayDepartment of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet KanbayDepartment of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Adrian CovicNephrology Department, "C. I. Parhon" Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Grigore T. Popa", Iasi, Romania.
Ionuţ NistorNephrology Department, "C. I. Parhon" Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Grigore T. Popa", Iasi, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic represents a major worldwide challenge, with a great impact on health systems and economic mechanisms. SARS-CoV-2, the pathogenic agent that generates COVID-19, creates a wide variety of organ dysfunctions, from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to acute myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolism. Mechanical circulatory support devices such as extracorporeal membrane circulatory oxygenation (ECMO) have shown their efficacy in maintaining organ perfusion in respiratory and cardiac impairments. With this review, we aimed to assess the impact of ECMO use in COVID-19 patients with ARDS. Material and methods: We performed a systematic review to find studies using ECMO in COVID-19. Comorbidities, side effects, and survival rate to discharge were analysed. The literature search was done using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase (Elsevier), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley) and clinicaltrials.gov databases (inception (December 2019) to October 16, 2021), by 2 authors. Results: We included 33 studies from 10 countries with a total of 4760 patients receiving ECMO for COVID-19. The survival rate varied from 9% to 90.6% at discharge. The most serious adverse events were acute kidney injury (up to 87%), major bleeding (up to 92.1%), strokes or cerebral haemorrhage (up to 34%). Other complications such as pulmonary embolism, peripheral bleeding, or sepsis had a major impact on survival rates. Conclusions: ECMO in COVID-19 patients may be a useful rescue therapy instrument, but due to the great variability of studies and still unknown mechanisms and effects of SARS-CoV-2, further studies need to be done.

Indexed as

acute respiratory distress syndromeCOVID-19extracorporeal life supportextracorporeal membrane circulatory oxygenationmechanical circulatory supportSARS-CoV-2survival

Identifiers

PMID40741272
PMCPMC12305791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.