ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2025
The possibilities of prospective assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infection risk based on an artificial neural network model - a cross-sectional and
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The prediction of how an infection of a new pathogen, such as SARS-CoV-2, will evolve using traditional modelling methods may turn out to be unattainable, although it could be achievable using Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with an original 118-item questionnaire. Information concerning participants' demographics, the circumstances of the contact with an infected person, general medical history, lifestyle, preventive behaviours, and the result of the COVID-19 test after the contact was obtained. The study included 1050 participants. The data were used to train and validate an artificial neural network. The project was funded by the Ministry of Education and Science as part of the "Studenckie Koła Naukowe Tworzą Innowacje" student competition (project no. SKN/SP/496779/2021). Results: The model in the analysis of total available cases had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.87, sensitivity of 87.2%, specificity of 80.6% and prediction accuracy of 84.5%. The model shows a high capacity for generalisation - in the testing data set: AUROC 0.76, sensitivity 86.2%, specificity 68.3%, prediction accuracy 78.7%. Conclusions: The developed tool is capable of high quality generalisation of the collected data, which translates into its ability to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a person after contact with a COVID-19 case. It has been deployed as an online calculator available on: https://www.umlub.pl/uczelnia/struktura-organizacyjna/szczegoly,317.html.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.