ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Efficacy and safety of human fibrinogen concentrate (BT524) in patients with major haemorrhage undergoing major orthopaedic or abdominal surgery (AdFIrst): a randomised, active-controlled, multicentre, partially blinded, phase 3 non-inferiority trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03444324 (A Randomized, Active-controlled, Multicenter, Phase III Study Investigating Efficacy and Safety of Intra-operative Use of BT524), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Active-controlled, Multicenter, Phase III Study Investigating Efficacy and Safety of Intra-operative Use of BT524 (Human Fibrinogen Concentrate) in Subjects Undergoing Major Spinal or Abdominal Surgery (AdFIrst)
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Biochemical and Functional Characterization of a Novel Human Fibrinogen Concentrate (BT524) and Established Plasma-Derived Fibrinogen Concentrates.Drug research · 2026Article
- Fibrinogen Concentrate in Acute Hemorrhage: Mechanistic Insight, Thresholds, and Targeted Replacement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Recommendations for implementing patient blood management-an updated modified Delphi consensus from a multidisciplinary expert panel in Hong Kong.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Major haemorrhage is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, but the optimal treatment remains disputed. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of human fibrinogen concentrate (FC) vs. either fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or cryoprecipitate (Cryo) as first-line treatment in patients with major bleeding during major orthopaedic or abdominal surgery, respectively. Methods: AdFIrst was a randomised, active-controlled, partially blinded, non-inferiority phase 3 trial conducted at 15 hospitals in Europe. Eligible patients (≥18 years), undergoing major spinal surgery or cytoreductive surgery for pseudomyxoma peritonei, with clinically relevant intraoperative blood loss were randomised by an interactive web response system (1:1) to receive intravenous FC (2-4 g) compared to FFP (15 mL/kg body weight) or Cryo (10 units); doses were repeated as needed. The primary endpoint was intraoperative blood loss from the time of decision to treat until the end of surgery with a non-inferiority margin of 150 mL, assessed in the per-protocol analysis set (PPS). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of trial drug. The trial is complete (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03444324). Findings: Between February 12, 2018, and November 21, 2023, 222 patients (131 [59%] female; 91 [41%] male; 97% white) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either FC (n = 110) or FFP/Cryo (n = 112). The PPS included 201 patients (FC: n = 103; FFP/Cryo: n = 98). The primary endpoint was met; the least squares mean (LSM: adjusted mean estimated using ANOVA) intraoperative blood loss was 1381 mL (95% confidence interval [CI] 1187-1574) in the FC group and 1660 mL (95% CI 1461-1860) in the FFP/Cryo group. The LSM difference was -279 mL (95% CI -552 to -6; p < 0·0001), indicating a notable treatment difference beyond non-inferiority. In a post-hoc analysis, FC showed superiority to reduce intraoperative blood loss over FFP/Cryo in the PPS (p = 0·0087). Serious adverse events were reported in 28/110 patients (25%) in the FC and 41/112 patients (37%) in the FFP/Cryo group. Thromboembolic events occurred in 17 patients (FC: 4 (4%) and FFP/Cryo: 13 (12%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation: In patients undergoing major spinal or cytoreductive surgery for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), FC was non-inferior to FFP/Cryo for the management of clinically relevant intraoperative bleeding. The efficacy and safety advantages observed in this trial support the emerging adoption of first-line use of FC in treatment guidelines. Funding: Biotest AG, Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.