Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741215›Full record

ReviewJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health2025

Sex Bias in Autoimmunity: New Findings and New Opportunities.

Vincent van Drongelen, Joanna Rew, Allison C Billi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vincent van DrongelenDepartment of Dermatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Joanna RewDepartment of Dermatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Allison C BilliDepartment of Dermatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autoimmune diseases result from the immune system's inability to discriminate between self and foreign antigens, leading to development of self-reactive immune cells and autoantibodies that can cause organ damage and failure. It has long been known that many autoimmune diseases are more common in females. Although much progress has been made over the years, the exact mechanisms for this sex bias are not yet fully understood. In this review, we provide an overview and update on how chromosomes, genes, sex hormones (including gender-affirming hormone therapy), immunometabolism, and the skin can play a role in sex-biased autoimmunity. We also identify gaps in our understanding that require additional research. In an era of increased development of personalized medicine, a thorough understanding of sex bias in autoimmunity may facilitate the development of much-needed targeted therapeutics, thereby reducing the risks of broader immunosuppression and adverse effects that lead to premature termination of treatment by patients.

Indexed as

AutoimmunitySex

Identifiers

PMID40741215
PMCPMC12308029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.