ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2025
Closure techniques for esophageal reconstruction after total laryngectomy and their impact on fistula formation.
Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stapler versus manual closure for pharyngeal repair after total laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rising incidence of laryngeal cancer has led to an increasing number of total laryngectomy procedures. While voice prostheses have significantly improved post-laryngectomy rehabilitation, the risk of salivary fistula remains a major complication. This study aims to compare the stapler and hand-sewn techniques for esophageal closure and evaluate their impact on fistula formation.
aimTo compare stapler-assisted and hand-sewn esophageal closure techniques after laryngectomy regarding their impact on salivary fistula formation.
methodsA total of 52 patients (44 men, 8 women), aged 43 to 77 years, underwent total laryngectomy. Esophageal reconstruction was performed using either a stapler (29 patients) or a hand-sewn technique (23 patients). A surgical stapler TA was used for esophageal closure in the stapler group. Patients were clinically monitored for fistula formation during the first 7 days postoperatively and again two weeks after discharge using fiberoptic examination.
resultsA total of 22 salivary fistulas were recorded: 17 (77.3%) occurred following the hand-sewn technique, while 5 (22.7%) developed in the stapler group. Additionally, preoperative radiotherapy was identified as a statistically significant risk factor for fistula formation. No technical complications related to the stapler device were observed.
conclusionAlthough hand-sewn closure is commonly used after total laryngectomy, stapler-assisted closure shows lower fistula rates and is a viable esophageal reconstruction alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.