ReviewWorld journal of clinical oncology2025
Early detection of gallbladder cancer: Current status and future perspectives.
Review in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Liquid biopsy in biliary tract cancers: early diagnosis, precision therapy, and prognostic evaluation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Incidental Gallbladder Carcinoma Discovered during Living Liver Donor Evaluation.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gall bladder cancer (GBC) remains a highly aggressive disease, with an overall 5-year dismal survival rate of 15%-20%. Its asymptomatic nature in very early stages and non-specific clinical presentations pose significant challenges to timely detection. Consequently, GBC often presents late, making it one of the most challenging cancers to manage. Surgery offers the best chance for long-term survival; however, only 10% of GBC patients are candidates for upfront resection, with the majority presenting in locally advanced or metastatic stages. Furthermore, GBC is generally resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, limiting the effectiveness of systemic therapy. Therefore, early diagnosis is crucial to offer the best treatment through surgical resection and to improve the outcome. Recent advancements in imaging technologies, biomarker discovery, and molecular diagnostics offer promising avenues for enhancing detection rates. Though non-invasive, most of them lack specificity, and the majority fail as an early diagnostic tool. This review examines the current status of early detection strategies for GBC, addresses the limitations of existing approaches, and explores the newer emerging diagnostic tools and techniques and how they can be exploited in future for its early detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.