ArticleClinical case reports2025
A Case Report of Fourth-Degree Facial Burns Treated With Modified Traditional Chinese Medicine Combined With Laser Therapy.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Case Report of Fourth-Degree Facial Burns Treated With Modified Traditional Chinese Medicine Combined With Laser Therapy.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report demonstrates the successful management of a 42-year-old male with fourth-degree facial burns using an integrated approach combining modified TCM and laser therapy. Following 12 months of combined treatment and 18 months of follow-up, the patient exhibited no evidence of scar hyperplasia or subcutaneous adhesions. This therapeutic strategy synergizes the systemic regulatory effects of TCM with precision laser technology, offering a clinically reproducible approach with significant translational potential. Our findings underscore two critical principles: (1) scar prevention supersedes corrective treatment, and (2) optimal scar outcomes originate from meticulous initial wound management. The case substantiates that comprehensive resolution of wound necrosis ("decay") yields superior long-term results compared to expedited wound closure alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.