Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741109›Full record

ArticleACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2025

Plasticizer Mixing Improved Regenerated Cellulose Films as an Alternative to Plastics.

Pauliina Ahokas, Vesa Kunnari, Johanna Majoinen, Ali Harlin, Mikko Mäkelä

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pauliina AhokasVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tietotie 4E, Espoo 02044, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2806-7373
Vesa KunnariVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tietotie 4E, Espoo 02044, Finland.
Johanna MajoinenVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tietotie 4E, Espoo 02044, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8941-2797
Ali HarlinVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tietotie 4E, Espoo 02044, Finland.
Mikko MäkeläVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tietotie 4E, Espoo 02044, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6174-6330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasticizers are widely used to improve the elasticity of regenerated cellulose films, but academic research has thus far ignored the possibility of plasticizer mixing. We studied the effects of glycerol, sorbitol, and maltitol on film properties based on a systematic design for mixture experiments and determined regression models to correlate the mixture composition with film properties. Our results showed that plasticizer mixing enabled us to control film tensile strength and water vapor and oxygen permeabilities, which are key indicators for evaluating film efficacy in barrier packaging applications. Our films showed lower water vapor and oxygen permeabilities than commercial uncoated cellophane films and could potentially provide a renewable alternative to conventional polyolefin films with further improvements. These results are important and they indicate that plasticizer mixing provides a novel and simple methodology to improve regenerated cellulose films to meet the increasing demand for alternatives to conventional plastics in packaging and other applications.

Indexed as

cellulose filmscrystallinitymixture designpermeabilityregression modelingtensile strength

Identifiers

PMID40741109
PMCPMC12309247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.