ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Clinical efficacy of surgically assisted transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for cavernous transformation of portal vein.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgery-assisted transmesenteric transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for esophagogastric bleeding in patients with cavernous transformation of the portal vein.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is contraindicated for patients with cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) due to high surgery-related mortality risk. However, surgically assisted TIPS (SATIPS) can significantly reduce the risk.
aimTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of SATIPS, this study was conducted.
methodsOne hundred and seven patients with CTPV and esophagogastric variceal bleeding were recruited from January 2023 to December 2024.The patients were recruited from three different hospitals. Overall, 54 patients received SATIPS treatment (SATIPS group), while 53 patients did not receive SATIPS and underwent prophylactic endoscopic sclerosing ligation (control group). Subsequently, survival rates, incidence rates of gastrointestinal bleeding, incidence of hepatic encephalopathy rate, and the incidence of liver failure after treatment in both groups at 3 and 6 months were observed.
resultsThe survival rates for the SATIPS and control groups were 94.4% and 92.5% at 3 months (
conclusionFor patients with CTPV, there were no optimal treatment. Regarding long-term efficacy, SATIPS can significantly reduce the rate of rebleeding, hepatic encephalopathy and liver failure, and is associated with better survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.