ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Deep learning-based localization and lesion detection in capsule endoscopy for patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: 2026 Update.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for the Detection of Small Bowel Lesions and Neoplasia: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Wireless Capsule Endoscopy: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Localization of Small Bowel Anatomic Transition Zones in Crohn's Disease Using Capsule Endoscopy.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Deep learning meets small-bowel capsule endoscopy: A step toward faster and more consistent diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in advanced endoscopic imaging: transforming optical diagnosis in gastroenterology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmall-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is widely used to evaluate obscure gastrointestinal bleeding; however, its interpretation is time-consuming and reader-dependent. Although artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged to address these limitations, few models simultaneously perform small-bowel (SB) localization and abnormality detection.
aimTo develop an AI model that automatically distinguishes the SB from the stomach and colon and diagnoses SB abnormalities.
methodsWe developed an AI model using 87005 CE images (11925, 33781, and 41299 from the stomach, SB, and colon, respectively) for SB localization and 28405 SBCE images (1337 erosions/ulcers, 126 angiodysplasia, 494 bleeding, and 26448 normal) for abnormality detection. The diagnostic performances of AI-assisted reading and conventional reading were compared using 32 SBCE videos in patients with suspicious SB bleeding.
resultsRegarding organ localization, the AI model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy exceeding 0.99 and 97%, respectively. For SB abnormality detection, the performance was as follows: Erosion/ulcer: 99.4% accuracy (AUC, 0.98); angiodysplasia: 99.8% accuracy (AUC, 0.99); bleeding: 99.9% accuracy (AUC, 0.99); normal: 99.3% accuracy (AUC, 0.98). In external validation, AI-assisted reading (8.7 minutes) was significantly faster than conventional reading (53.9 minutes;
conclusionOur AI model decreased SBCE reading time and achieved performance comparable to that of experienced endoscopists, suggesting that AI integration into SBCE reading enables efficient and reliable SB abnormality detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.