ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
Use of serotonergic antidepressants and perioperative complications in patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SRIs) are commonly utilised antidepressants among populations in Western countries; however, their use has been linked to adverse effects and postoperative complications. This systematic review assessed the risk of both early and late perioperative complications in SRIs users undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to non-users. Methods: This study adhered to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Science Direct/Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted from inception until January 2025. Comparative studies examining SRI users and non-users undergoing elective THA or TKA that addressed at least one postoperative outcome (blood loss, postoperative haemoglobin reduction, transfusion rate, length of stay, readmission and revision rate) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed to evaluate the quality of the included studies. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the risk of transfusion, utilising a random-effects model. Results: Ten comparative cohort studies, including two prospective and eight retrospective studies, were included in this analysis, involving 2,098,833 patients who underwent either elective THA or TKA. Among these patients, 418,527 were using SRIs during the perioperative period, with a mean age of 65.2 years. Our meta-analysis revealed an odds ratio of 1.78 (95 % CI, 1.11, 2.83; p = 0.02) concerning the blood transfusion rate in patients utilising SRIs, although it was characterised by considerable heterogeneity (I Conclusion: The use of SRIs in patients undergoing elective THA and TKA may be linked to a slightly increased risk of bleeding and need for blood transfusion. However, considering the potential benefits of these medications for this patient group, it remains uncertain whether discontinuing them during the perioperative period is advisable. More high-quality studies are required to establish an etiological relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.