Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741056›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental vaccine research2025

Evaluation of the safety and immunogenicity of the ERAGS-GFP oral rabies vaccine in dogs.

Dong-Kun Yang, Ju-Yeon Lee, Minuk Kim, Hye Jeong Lee, Gyu-Nam Park, Yun Sang Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental vaccine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dong-Kun YangViral Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Gimcheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5765-3043
Ju-Yeon LeeViral Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Gimcheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6390-8268
Minuk KimViral Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Gimcheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5626-1420
Hye Jeong LeeViral Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Gimcheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2044-6176
Gyu-Nam ParkViral Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Gimcheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9179-1535
Yun Sang ChoViral Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Gimcheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1346-7067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies is a fatal zoonotic disease primarily transmitted through dog bites, making oral rabies vaccines critical for disease control. This study evaluated the immunogenicity of the ERAGS-GFP oral rabies vaccine strain in dogs. To optimize viral production, we examined cell density, multiplicity of infection (MOI), and freeze-thaw cycles. Safety was assessed via clinical monitoring, body temperature, and weight changes. Immunogenicity was evaluated using rabies virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) titers. Vero cells at MOI 2 with 3 freeze-thaw cycles yielded the highest viral titers. Vaccinated dogs showed no clinical symptoms and developed sustained protective VNA titers, demonstrating ERAGS-GFP's efficacy in rabies control.

Indexed as

DogsERAGS-GFPImmunogenicityRabiesSafety

Identifiers

PMID40741056
PMCPMC12303705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.