Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741049›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025

Development and validation of deep learning- and ensemble learning-based biological ages in the NHANES study.

Yushu Huang, Xifan Yang, Qi Wang, Adila Abula, Yue Dong, Wenyuan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yushu Huang *Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Department of Big Data in Health Science School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xifan Yang *Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Department of Big Data in Health Science School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Qi WangCenter of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Department of Big Data in Health Science School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Adila AbulaCenter of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Department of Big Data in Health Science School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yue DongCenter of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Department of Big Data in Health Science School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wenyuan LiCenter of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Department of Big Data in Health Science School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Conventional machine learning (ML) approaches for constructing biological age (BA) have predominantly relied on blood-based markers, limiting their scope. This study aims to develop and validate novel ML-based BA models using a comprehensive set of clinical, behavioral, and socioeconomic factors and evaluate their predictive performance for mortality. Methods: We analyzed data from 24,985 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2010, with follow-up extending to 31 December 2019, or until death or loss to follow-up. Thirty features, including blood and urine biochemistry, physical examination data, behavioral traits, and socioeconomic factors, were selected using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). These features were utilized to train deep neural networks (DNN) and ensemble learning models, specifically the Deep Biological Age (DBA) and Ensemble Biological Age (EnBA), with chronological age (CA) as the reference label. Model performance was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE), while interpretability was explored using Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP). Predictive accuracy of DBA and EnBA for mortality was compared with Phenotypic Age (PhenoAge) using the area under the curve (AUC) derived from Cox proportional hazards models and hazard ratios (HR), adjusted for demographics and lifestyle factors. Sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure robustness. Results: DBA and EnBA accurately predicted actual age (MAE = 2.98 and 3.58 years, respectively) and demonstrated strong predictive capability for all-cause mortality, with AUCs of 0.896 (95% CI: 0.891-0.898) for DBA and 0.889 (95% CI: 0.884-0.894) for EnBA. Higher DBA and EnBA accelerations were significantly associated with increased mortality risk (HR = 1.059 and 1.039, respectively). SHAP analysis highlighted prescription medication usage, hepatitis B surface antibody status, and vigorous physical activity as the most influential features contributing to DBA predictions. Furthermore, BA acceleration was linked to elevated risk of death from specific chronic conditions, including cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and cancer. Discussion: Our study successfully developed and validated two ML-based BA models capable of accurately predicting both all-cause and cause-specific mortality. These findings suggest that the DBA and EnBA models hold promise for early identification of high-risk individuals, potentially facilitating timely preventive interventions and improving population health outcomes.

Indexed as

agingbiological agedeep learningdeep neural networksmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40741049
PMCPMC12307447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.