ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2025
New Classification of Autologous Tooth-Derived Grafting Materials: Fundamental Concepts.
Review in International journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Culture-Based Microbiological Assessment of Dentin Biomaterials Prepared from Long-Term Refrigerated Human Teeth: A Pilot Study Toward Evidence-Based Tooth Banking.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Physicochemical Stability of Dentin-Derived Biomaterials During Long-Term Storage.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Research Trends in Autogenous Dentin Graft: A Bibliometric and Cluster Analysis (2006-2025).International dental journal · 2026Article
- Effects of HCl concentration and immersion time on physicochemical properties, BMP-2 detection, degradation, and osteoblast response of human demineralized tooth matrix.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
- Correction to "New Classification of Autologous Tooth-Derived Grafting Materials: Fundamental Concepts".International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- The tooth transformer® revolution: autologous dentin biomaterials and platelet concentrates in oral regeneration. A parallel narrative systematic review.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of dentin grafts is relatively recent, and their efficacy remains a topic of debate. Various techniques and devices are available for dentin grafting; however, their application has been inconsistent, as each method yields a distinct product with unique biological properties and potential uses. One of the challenges that arises with the introduction of a new biomaterial is the potential confusion between different preparations. Specifically, generalization may significantly impact the understanding of unique qualities and/or potential limitations. The various materials that make up the family of tooth-derived graft materials share only one common starting point: the patient's extracted tooth. Beyond that, the processes of grinding, demineralization, and detoxification differ significantly, resulting in final materials with completely different percentages of minerals, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), collagenic and noncollagenic proteins, and residual bacterial load. These differences influence the regenerative potential of one material compared to another, as well as the resorption rate. For instance, incomplete sterilization of the material can accelerate the resorption process, leading to insufficient regeneration. Here, we propose a classification of dentin grafts into four categories based on their processing methods. This classification aims to clarify the successes and challenges encountered to date, offering an objective framework to guide the ongoing development of these techniques. The aim of this study is to establish the first classification system of autogenous partial demineralized tooth-derived grafting biomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.