Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741041›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2025

New Classification of Autologous Tooth-Derived Grafting Materials: Fundamental Concepts.

Elio Minetti, Silvio Taschieri, Marco Berardini, Stefano Corbella

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elio MinettiDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Science, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-8063
Silvio TaschieriDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Science, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7866-5024
Marco BerardiniPrivate Practitioner, Pescara, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2019-2380
Stefano CorbellaDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Science, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8428-8811

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of dentin grafts is relatively recent, and their efficacy remains a topic of debate. Various techniques and devices are available for dentin grafting; however, their application has been inconsistent, as each method yields a distinct product with unique biological properties and potential uses. One of the challenges that arises with the introduction of a new biomaterial is the potential confusion between different preparations. Specifically, generalization may significantly impact the understanding of unique qualities and/or potential limitations. The various materials that make up the family of tooth-derived graft materials share only one common starting point: the patient's extracted tooth. Beyond that, the processes of grinding, demineralization, and detoxification differ significantly, resulting in final materials with completely different percentages of minerals, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), collagenic and noncollagenic proteins, and residual bacterial load. These differences influence the regenerative potential of one material compared to another, as well as the resorption rate. For instance, incomplete sterilization of the material can accelerate the resorption process, leading to insufficient regeneration. Here, we propose a classification of dentin grafts into four categories based on their processing methods. This classification aims to clarify the successes and challenges encountered to date, offering an objective framework to guide the ongoing development of these techniques. The aim of this study is to establish the first classification system of autogenous partial demineralized tooth-derived grafting biomaterials.

Indexed as

autogenous toothbiomaterialsbone regenerationclassificationdentin graftnone substitutestooth bone graftingtooth graft

Identifiers

PMID40741041
PMCPMC12310315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.