ReviewCureus2025
Practical Applications of Lung and Diaphragm Ultrasound in the Intensive Care Unit: An Updated Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung ultrasound (LUS) has evolved significantly during the past few decades. Its use has been integrated into daily practices of intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide, and it has proven to be a valuable tool in the assessment and management of patients with respiratory failure caused by lung, pleural, diaphragmatic, and other diseases. LUS techniques are becoming increasingly standardized, which can help in interpreting data and improving patients' outcomes. In this narrative review, the focus was on the practical daily applications of lung, pleural, and diaphragmatic ultrasound with emphasis on different signs and artifacts that guide the interpretation of data and identification of disease. Discussions and analysis from the new international guidelines were added to help close the gap in the use of LUS. This review is intended to serve as a practical guide for using bedside ultrasound in evaluating patients with shortness of breath and respiratory failure and to provide guidance to help providers manage patients and generate standardized reports. We start with an analysis of best practices and guidelines on performing an LUS exam in the ICU setting. This analysis is followed by data interpretation of findings starting at the pleural line and traveling deeper into the lung tissue. The review includes discussions of the diaphragm evaluation and its function and abnormalities, as well as common LUS-related procedures in the ICU, such as thoracentesis, tracheostomy, and cricothyrotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.