ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Improving Involvement of Families of Small Babies through Family Education, Family Integration, and Multidisciplinary Teamwork: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Skin-to-Skin Contact During the Golden Hour for Neonates ≥34 Weeks: Single-Site Quality-Improvement Initiative Study.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Synthesizing Interest-holder Perspectives and Evidence-based Potentially Better Practices to Improve High-risk Infant Follow-through Care Quality.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Partnering with and educating families in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is critical for infant neurodevelopment, parent wellness, and family support. Early family integration in care improves both short-term and long-term outcomes. This quality improvement project has 2 specific aims: (1) increase the percentage of small babies (born at <28 wk of gestation or <1000 g) whose families participated in a multidisciplinary family-centered care conference (FCCC) from 0% to 50%, and (2) increase family attendance at the first NICU follow-up clinic from 74% to 90%. Methods: Using the model for improvement, we conducted plan-do-study-act cycles with iterative interventions to achieve our aims. The FCCCs focused on promoting family involvement at the bedside, infant neurodevelopment, skin-to-skin care, family support, and transitions within the NICU and after discharge. Outcome, process, and balancing measures were tracked and analyzed for special cause variation using statistical process control charts. Results: Within 18 months, the percentage of infants whose families participated in an FCCC increased from 0% to 39% (48/123). Based on the post-FCCC survey, families found the FCCC helpful in providing information on how they can be involved in their infant's care. They recommended the FCCC to other families, and they expressed interest in a second FCCC focused on preparing for the transition home. Conclusions: Family participation in a multidisciplinary FCCC increased over time but has not yet achieved the stated goal. We anticipate that further plan-do-study-act cycles will improve adherence to a robust FCCC program by integrating families into their infants' care during critical developmental stages.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.