Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741005›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Comparative effectiveness of plant-derived compounds in keloid management: a review.

Arya Tjipta Prananda, Sony Eka Nugraha, Putri Cahaya Situmorang, Rony Abdi Syahputra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arya Tjipta PranandaFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
Sony Eka NugrahaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
Putri Cahaya SitumorangStudy Program of Biology, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
Rony Abdi SyahputraDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keloids are a challenging dermatological condition characterized by excessive scar formation beyond the original wound site, high recurrence rates, and limited treatment efficacy. Current therapies, such as corticosteroids, surgery, and radiotherapy, often yield suboptimal outcomes and adverse effects. This review evaluates the potential of plant-derived metabolites as safer and more effective alternatives for keloid management. Preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate that compounds like curcumin, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), and asiaticoside exhibit anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties by modulating key pathways (e.g., TGF-β/Smad, NF-κB, and oxidative stress). Espite promising preclinical and early clinical findings, critical challenges hinder the clinical translation of these metabolites. These include poor and variable bioavailability, inconsistencies in extract standardization, and a paucity of large-scale, rigorously designed trials. Moreover, some metabolites may yield conflicting results or exhibit off-target effects in in vitro systems, necessitating caution in interpreting their true therapeutic potential. Future research should focus on optimizing drug delivery systems, conducting large-scale trials, and integrating personalized medicine approaches. Plant-derived metabolites represent a multi-targeted therapeutic strategy with the potential to address unmet needs in keloid treatment.

Indexed as

anti-fibrotic therapybioavailability challengeskeloid managementpersonalized medicineplant-derived metabolites

Identifiers

PMID40741005
PMCPMC12307374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.