Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40741004›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Building trust in clinical research: a systems approach to ethical engagement and sustainable outcomes.

Johanna M C Blom, Veronica Rivi, Fabio Tascedda, Luca Pani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ethics as if Your Life Depended on It.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2026
    Article
  2. Responses to Commentaries on "Ethics as if Your Life Depended on It".Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna M C Blom *Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Veronica RiviDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Fabio TasceddaCenter for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Luca Pani *Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trust and trustworthiness are critical to the success of clinical research, profoundly influencing participant engagement, data integrity, and study outcomes. These behaviors emerge from complex, dynamic interactions within the clinical research ecosystem, involving stakeholders such as sponsors, participants, clinicians, researchers, and regulatory bodies. The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines has underscored the potential of scientific advancements to build public trust in the scientific outcomes, while also exposing vulnerabilities in the procedural trust framework due to misinformation and historical unethical practices. This paper explores trust and trustworthiness as emergent properties within the complex systems of clinical research, highlighting their evolution through transparent communication, participant empowerment, and ethical governance. A systems approach is emphasized, where trust develops holistically, influenced by regulatory frameworks, interpersonal relationships, and the overall research environment. Practical implications include the adoption of adaptive consent models, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the integration of continuous feedback mechanisms. To address trust erosion, especially among marginalized communities, we advocate for participatory research approaches and the development of new professional competencies, such as the role of a Clinical Research Liaison. This role would ensure ongoing alignment with community needs, enhance transparency, and maintain ethical standards, ultimately fostering a research environment where trust and trustworthiness thrive, benefiting both participants and the broader scientific community. A roadmap for future efforts includes the systematic incorporation of these elements into clinical research practices to enhance trust and improve research outcomes.

Indexed as

autonomyclinical researchemergenceempowermentengagementrespectsocial alliancetransparency

Identifiers

PMID40741004
PMCPMC12307415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.