SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Polymorphisms in
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Microbiome Associations with Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in Adult Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Population Pharmacokinetic and Machine Learning.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Observational
- Effects of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 genetic variants on tacrolimus metabolism during the early period after kidney transplantation.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Article
- Tacrolimus Concentration/Dose Ratio in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients: An Exploratory Study of Metabolizer Phenotyping and Clinical Outcomes.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Decreasing Tacrolimus Concentrations in Routine Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Data Indicate Adherence to Updated Therapeutic Goals.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Electrolyte disturbances after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors: incidence and severity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review assessed the impact of Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024517094, PROSPERO, CRD42024599998.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.