ArticleArthroplasty today2025
Does Restoration of Constitutional Alignment Improve Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between Coronal Mechanical Axis Correction and Early Functional Outcomes after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Functional alignment preserves the native Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee phenotype while improving early clinical outcomes after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While neutral mechanical alignment has been the gold standard for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), constitutional knee alignment is commonly nonneutral and varies widely among individuals. We aimed to determine if a bounded functional alignment strategy in robotic assisted TKA restored constitutional alignment and if this restoration resulted in superior patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent robotic TKA with a bounded functional alignment strategy at a single institution. Final intraoperative knee alignment was compared to calculated constitutional alignment, which was unknown to the surgeons during the procedure. PROs (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) with a 1-year follow-up were compared between patients with a final knee alignment within 2° of constitutional alignment compared with those >2° from calculated constitutional alignment. Mean changes in PROs were analyzed, and proportions achieving minimally clinical important difference between groups was determined. Results: Of the 188 knees included, 52% (n = 98) were balanced within 2° of constitutional alignment. Despite significant differences in alignment changes between groups (2.0° vs 4.5°), no significant differences were observed in PRO measures. Mean Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement improvement (25.0 vs 29.5), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Health (8.0 vs 7.7), and Mental Health (2.7 vs 1.2) scores were comparable. Similar proportions in both groups achieved minimally clinical important difference across all measures. Conclusions: While robotic bounded functional strategy restored constitutional alignment in half of cases, this did not result in superior PROs at 1 year. Achieving soft tissue balance within acceptable parameters of alignment and bony excision may be more important than precise restoration of prearthritic alignment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.